Review
I was looking forward to reading this article after seeing the title, but was dissapointed to see how quickly the authors dismissed open review as an option. In doing that, they cited a publication from 1999! In that publication the authors actually wrote the researchers were in favour of open peer review.
The authors should dig a bit deeper into the subject and consider simpler and more logical solutions which are already out there, before proposing novel indices and systems.
I give this paper a 5, for the effort.
Publication rating
Publication quality: 5 / 9
Stats
- Recommendations +3 100% positive of 3 vote(s)
- Views 35185
- Comments 0
Recommended by
Recommended
-
Nithya Babu Rajendran
Research Associate (Postdoc), UKM Uniklinikum Münster | Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität
Also:
- Volunteer Content Manager | Science Simplified
- Volunteer Science Writer | Life Science Network gGmbH
-
Alen Piljić
Managing director | Life Science Network gGmbH
Also:
- President | Research Elements Association
-
Stefan Terjung
Senior Scientific Officer | Advanced Light Microscopy Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory